Mandatory Levy of Service Charge by Restaurants Violates Consumer Law: CCPA
The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) has taken suo motu cognizance against 27 restaurants located across the country for violation of consumer rights and adoption of unfair trade practices under Section 2(47) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, relating to the mandatory levy of service charge.
The action follows the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi dated 28 March 2025, which upheld the Guidelines issued by CCPA on levy of service charge. The Court held that mandatory collection of service charge by restaurants is contrary to law and observed that all restaurant establishments are required to adhere to the CCPA guidelines. The Court further affirmed that CCPA is fully empowered to enforce its guidelines in accordance with law.
The Guidelines to Prevent Unfair Trade Practices and Protection of Consumer Interest with Regard to Levy of Service Charge in Hotels and Restaurants, issued by CCPA on 4 July 2022, stipulate that:
- No hotel or restaurant shall add service charge automatically or by default in the food bill
- No service charge shall be collected by any other name
- Consumers shall not be forced to pay service charge and must be clearly informed that it is voluntary and optional
- No restriction on entry or provision of services shall be imposed based on refusal to pay service charge
- Service charge shall not be added to the bill and subjected to GST
Investigations revealed that several restaurants, including CafĂ© Blue Bottle, Patna, and China Gate Restaurant Private Limited (Bora Bora), Mumbai, were automatically levying a 10% service charge by default, in clear violation of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 and the CCPA Guidelines, which have now been upheld by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.
The action was initiated based on complaints received on the National Consumer Helpline (NCH), supported by invoices clearly reflecting default addition of service charge. A detailed investigation established that such practices amount to Unfair Trade Practice under Section 2(47) of the Act.
Comments