Criteria for Global Systemically Important Banks ( G-SIBs ) by FSB vs Domestic Systemically Important Banks (D-SIBs) by RBI
The major difference between BCBS methodology for G-SIB identification and RBI methodology for D-SIB identification is as follows:
S. No. | Point of difference | BCBS G-SIB identification methodology | RBI D-SIB identification methodology |
1 | Sample of banks | 75 largest global banks based on financial year end Basel III leverage ratio exposure measure. National supervisors have the discretion to add any bank in the sample apart from 75 largest banks. | Banks having size (Basel III leverage ratio exposure measure) as a percentage of GDP equal to or more than 2%. Additionally five largest foreign banks, based on their size, will also be added in the sample. |
2 | Indicators | Five broad indicators: | Four broad indicators as mentioned in BCBS’s framework for D-SIBs will be used: |
3. | Indicator weights | All indicators given equal weight with a cap to substitutability category weight | Size will be given a weight of 40% and other three indicators will be given a weight of 20% each |
4. | Sub-indicators | Three sub-indicators for Complexity indicator: | Level 3 assets for complexity indicator dropped and instead cross jurisdictional liabilities added. |
Comments