The Forest (Conservation) Amendment Bill, 2023

 Highlights of the Bill

  • The Bill amends the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 to make it applicable to certain types of land.   These include land notified as a forest under the Indian Forest Act, 1927 or in government records after the 1980 Act came into effect.  The Act will not be applicable for land converted to non-forest use before December 12, 1996.

  • It also exempts certain types of land from the purview of the Act. These include land within 100 km of India’s border needed for national security projects, small roadside amenities, and public roads leading to a habitation.

  • The state government requires prior approval of the central government to assign any forest land to a private entity.  The Bill extends this to all entities, and allows the assignment to be made on terms and conditions specified by the central government.

  • The Act specifies some activities that can be carried out in forests, such as establishing check posts, fencing, and bridges.  The Bill also allows running zoos, safaris and eco-tourism facilities.

Key Issues and Analysis

  • The Bill excludes two categories of land from the purview of the Act: land recorded as forest before October 25, 1980 but not notified as a forest, and land which changed from forest-use to non-forest-use before December 12, 1996.  This provision may go against a 1996 Supreme Court judgement on preventing deforestation.

  • Exempting land near border areas for national security projects may adversely impact the forest cover and wildlife in north-eastern states. 

  • A blanket exemption for projects like zoos, eco-tourism facilities, and reconnaissance surveys may adversely affect forest land and wildlife.

Key Features

  • Land under the purview of the Act:  The Bill provides that two types of land will be under the purview of the Act: (i) land declared/notified as a forest under the Indian Forest Act, 1927 or under any other law, or (ii) land not covered in the first category but notified as a forest on or after October 25, 1980 in a government record.  Further, the Act will not apply to land changed from forest use to non-forest use on or before December 12, 1996 by any authority authorised by a state/UT.

  • Exempted categories of land:  The Bill exempts certain types of land from the provisions of the Act, such as forest land along a rail line or a public road maintained by the government providing access to a habitation, or to a rail, and roadside amenities up to a maximum size of 0.10 hectare.  Forest land that will also be exempted includes: (i) land situated within 100 km from international borders, Line of Control, or Line of Actual Control, for construction of a strategic linear project of national importance and concerning national security, (ii) land up to 10 hectares, for constructing security-related infrastructure, or (iii) land proposed to be used for constructing defence related projects, camps for paramilitary forces, or public utility projects up to five hectares in a left-wing extremism affected area.  These exemptions will be subject to the terms and conditions specified by the central government by guidelines.

  • Assignment/leasing of forest land:  Under the Act, a state government requires prior approval of the central government to assign forest land to any entity not owned or controlled by government.   In the Bill, this condition is extended to all entities, including those owned and controlled by government.  It also requires that prior approval be subject to terms and conditions prescribed by the central government.

  • Permitted activities in forest land:  The Act restricts the de-reservation of forests or use of forest land for non-forest purposes.  Such restrictions may be lifted with the prior approval of the central government. Non-forest purposes include use of land for cultivating horticultural crops or for any purpose other than reafforestation.  The Act specifies certain activities that will be excluded from non-forest purposes, meaning that restrictions on the use of forest land for non-forest purposes will not apply.  These activities include works related to the conservation, management, and development of forest and wildlife such as establishing check posts, fire lines, fencing, and wireless communication. 

The Bill adds more activities to this list such as: (i) zoos and safaris under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 owned by the government or any authority, in forest areas other than protected areas, (ii) ecotourism facilities, (iii) silvicultural operations (enhancing forest growth), and (iv) any other purpose specified by the central government.  Further, the central government may specify terms and conditions to exclude any survey (such as exploration activity, seismic survey) from being classified as non-forest purpose.

  • Power to issue directions:  The Bill adds that the central government may issue directions for the implementation of the Act to any authority/organisation under or recognised by the centre, state, or union territory (UT).

While clarifying the scope of the 1980 Act, the Supreme Court (1996) held that the Act intends to check deforestation that disrupts the ecological balance.  Therefore, the Act must apply to all forests irrespective of the nature of ownership or classification.  This includes all forests as per the dictionary meaning of ‘forest’ and any area recorded as forest in the government record irrespective of the ownership.  Therefore, excluding land that was not notified as a forest before October 25, 1980 from the purview of the Act, but recorded as such in government records, may go against the judgment.

The Supreme Court (1996) also directed that all ongoing non-forest activities in forests must be stopped if they have only received approval from the state government and not the central government.  It noted that all such activities would be in violation of the 1980 Act. The Bill states that land which changed from forest to non-forest use before the date of the judgement will be exempted from the purview of the 1980 Act.  In carving out this exemption, the Bill may be going against the judgement.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Russian parliament passed a bill to revoke its ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty

Interstellar space and Interstellar Probes ( Voyager and New Horizons Missions )

UPSC IAS Daily Current Affairs ( 05 - 12 - 2023 ) by UniFocus IAS